You need a reliable way to gauge current congestion at Ningbo (CNNBO) to plan sailings, allocate equipment, and set customer expectations. By the end of this guide, you will be able to query the FreightPulse Port Congestion endpoint for Ningbo, parse the response, understand what the metrics mean (and what they do not), and integrate the data safely into your transportation workflow.
What the Ningbo congestion data measures (and what it does not)
The FreightPulse endpoint for port congestion returns IMF PortWatch metrics for Ningbo (CNNBO). The series uses AIS-derived port calls, lagged about 6–7 days, and reports a 7-day average compared to a 90-day baseline. This is a statistical proxy for congestion; it is not a live measurement of vessel wait or anchorage times.
In practice, you will consume three core fields for decisioning:
- congestion: categorical label such as low, moderate, or high.
- ratio_vs_baseline: the recent 7-day average divided by the 90-day baseline (dimensionless).
- as_of: the date stamp for the series in ISO YYYY-MM-DD format.
Because the data is lagged and smoothed, it is best suited to trend-aware planning (e.g., weekly schedule resilience) rather than same-day reroutes.
Authentication, quota, and envelope
Requests are authenticated by an X-API-Key header. Guests without a key are limited to 100 requests per day per IP. Every successful response uses an envelope of {"success":true,"data":{...}} that contains the payload you will parse. When integrating, always check the top-level success flag before using fields deeper in the object.
Auth header:
- X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY
Quickstart: curl for Ningbo (CNNBO)
Use the following curl command to fetch the latest available congestion metrics for Ningbo:
curl -H "X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY" "https://freightpulsehq.com/api/v1/port-congestion?port=CNNBO"
This GET endpoint takes a single required query parameter port with value CNNBO for Ningbo. It returns a JSON envelope containing the congestion classification and underlying baseline comparison metrics.
Official JSON example and the fields you will use
Below is the official FreightPulse JSON example for Ningbo congestion. Copy and run the curl above to retrieve current values; do not hard-code values in production.
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"results": [
{
"port": "Ningbo",
"locode": "CN NBO",
"country": "China",
"congestion": "moderate",
"as_of": "2026-09-25",
"metrics": {
"recent_avg_portcalls_per_day": 44.9,
"baseline_avg_portcalls_per_day": 45.8,
"ratio_vs_baseline": 0.98
}
}
],
"global_summary": {
"ports_high_congestion": 0,
"ports_moderate": 1,
"ports_low": 0
},
"meta": {
"source": "IMF PortWatch (portwatch.imf.org) - UN Global Platform AIS data",
"data_lag_days": "~6-7 (daily updates, not real-time)",
"methodology": "congestion level is an approximation: last 7 days' avg port calls vs 90-day baseline for the same port. Does not measure vessel wait/anchorage time."
}
},
"meta": {
"request_id": "668b81ce-daae-40da-a940-8cd2cf29ea78"
}
}
Fields you will operationalize:
- data.results[0].congestion: the human-readable congestion label for Ningbo.
- data.results[0].as_of: the date for which the 7-day vs 90-day metrics apply.
- data.results[0].metrics.ratio_vs_baseline: a ratio near 1.0 indicates activity close to the 90-day baseline; values below 1.0 often align with less crowding, and above 1.0 may indicate heavier-than-baseline activity.
- data.results[0].metrics.recent_avg_portcalls_per_day and baseline_avg_portcalls_per_day: numeric series counts underlying the ratio.
Remember: this is IMF PortWatch methodology, lagged ~6–7 days, and not a live queue length or anchorage wait time feed.
End-to-end example in Python
The snippet below fetches the Ningbo congestion payload, validates the envelope, and extracts the fields your scheduler or TMS would consume. It also shows a simple cache key structure you can reuse if you run this as a scheduled job.
import os
import requests
from datetime import datetime
API_URL = "https://freightpulsehq.com/api/v1/port-congestion"
PORT = "CNNBO"
API_KEY = os.getenv("FREIGHTPULSE_API_KEY", "YOUR_API_KEY")
def fetch_cnnbo_congestion():
headers = {"X-API-Key": API_KEY}
params = {"port": PORT}
resp = requests.get(API_URL, headers=headers, params=params, timeout=20)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
if not data.get("success"):
raise RuntimeError("FreightPulse request failed: success=false")
results = data.get("data", {}).get("results", [])
if not results:
raise ValueError("No results returned for CNNBO")
row = results[0]
metrics = row.get("metrics", {})
# Extract the fields you will use downstream
congestion_label = row.get("congestion")
as_of = row.get("as_of") # YYYY-MM-DD
ratio = metrics.get("ratio_vs_baseline")
recent = metrics.get("recent_avg_portcalls_per_day")
baseline = metrics.get("baseline_avg_portcalls_per_day")
return {
"port": row.get("port"),
"locode": row.get("locode"),
"country": row.get("country"),
"congestion": congestion_label,
"as_of": as_of,
"ratio_vs_baseline": ratio,
"recent_avg_portcalls_per_day": recent,
"baseline_avg_portcalls_per_day": baseline,
}
if __name__ == "__main__":
payload = fetch_cnnbo_congestion()
# Example decision use: guardrail dispatch logic
print(f"Ningbo congestion: {payload['congestion']} (ratio={payload['ratio_vs_baseline']}) as_of {payload['as_of']}")
# Suggest a cache key you can store for 24h:
cache_key = f"freightpulse:cnnbo:{payload['as_of']}"
print("cache_key:", cache_key)
Units, timestamps, and update cadence
- Units: portcalls_per_day are counts of vessel port calls per day. The ratio_vs_baseline is unitless.
- Timestamps: as_of is a date in YYYY-MM-DD. Treat it as a calendar date for which the 7-day rolling window endpoint is reporting; no time-of-day is included.
- Cadence: data is lagged ~6–7 days and updated daily. Do not expect intraday changes.
- Caching: since the series is updated daily, a 12–24 hour cache per port is reasonable. Always re-fetch once per day to roll the 7-day window forward.
- Global aggregates: data.global_summary is provided for context but is optional for single-port operational logic.
Robust request patterns and error handling
As a practical integration pattern, wrap calls with these safeguards:
- Always check the top-level success flag before dereferencing data.*.
- Set a sensible timeout (10–20 seconds) and implement a single retry on network timeouts. Avoid retry storms; the data is not real-time.
- Validate that results is a non-empty array. If empty, keep your previous day’s cached series and alert asynchronously.
- Log the meta.request_id for troubleshooting.
- Respect guest rate limits (100 requests/day per IP without a key). If you run scheduled jobs, consolidate lookups rather than polling repeatedly.
How to use congestion and ratio safely in planning
For Ningbo, you will typically wire three checks into your planning app:
- Staleness guard: if today - as_of >= 10 days, flag the data as stale but keep using the last known value until the next daily refresh.
- Trend check: inspect ratio_vs_baseline relative to 1.0. Values near 1.0 suggest baseline-like throughput; materially below 1.0 can indicate lighter-than-baseline activity; above 1.0 suggests heavier activity.
- Human-readable status: display congestion with the as_of date so operators know they are looking at a lagged aggregation, not queue lengths.
Do not treat this as a live wait-time or berthing delay feed. It is best used to shape weekly allocations, feeder scheduling, and contingency buffers rather than same-day linehaul changes.
JavaScript fetch example (browser or Node)
This example shows how to call the same endpoint and extract the operational fields. In browsers, do not expose real keys; proxy through your backend if needed.
const API_URL = "https://freightpulsehq.com/api/v1/port-congestion?port=CNNBO";
async function getCnnboCongestion() {
const resp = await fetch(API_URL, {
headers: { "X-API-Key": "YOUR_API_KEY" }
});
if (!resp.ok) {
throw new Error("HTTP error " + resp.status);
}
const json = await resp.json();
if (!json.success) {
throw new Error("FreightPulse response success=false");
}
const results = json.data?.results || [];
if (results.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No results for CNNBO");
}
const row = results[0];
const metrics = row.metrics || {};
return {
congestion: row.congestion,
as_of: row.as_of,
ratio_vs_baseline: metrics.ratio_vs_baseline
};
}
getCnnboCongestion()
.then(d => {
console.log(`Ningbo congestion: ${d.congestion} (ratio=${d.ratio_vs_baseline}) as_of ${d.as_of}`);
})
.catch(err => {
console.error("Failed to load CNNBO congestion:", err);
});
Validation checklist for your first deployment
- Authentication: confirm the X-API-Key header is present and non-empty in all requests. If running without a key, ensure your job schedule respects the 100/day/IP limit.
- Envelope checks: assert success === true and results.length > 0 before reading fields.
- Field parsing: read congestion, as_of, and metrics.ratio_vs_baseline. Treat as_of as a date string; do not parse time-of-day.
- Caching: persist the response keyed by port and as_of (e.g., freightpulse:cnnbo:YYYY-MM-DD) for 24 hours.
- Operator UI: show congestion plus as_of and a short note that the series is lagged ~6–7 days and reflects 7-day average vs 90-day baseline.
- Alerts: set guardrails if as_of is older than expected or if the ratio jumps materially day-over-day.
Origin catalog facts you must keep in your implementation
- Auth: header X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY. Guest without key: 100 requests/day per IP.
- Envelope: {"success":true,"data":{...}}
- Port congestion is IMF PortWatch, lagged ~6–7 days, 7-day avg vs 90-day baseline — not live AIS.
- Do not quote a freight-rates USD fare as today’s price (this endpoint reports congestion metrics, not fares).
- Port: Ningbo (CNNBO)
- curl: curl -H "X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY" "https://freightpulsehq.com/api/v1/port-congestion?port=CNNBO"
- Field names to rely on: congestion, ratio_vs_baseline, as_of (and supporting metrics fields for transparency).
Common pitfalls to avoid
- Assuming real-time: these figures are not live AIS wait times. They are lagged, smoothed indicators of activity relative to baseline.
- Inferring ETAs directly: do not convert ratio_vs_baseline into hour-level ETAs without a calibrated model. Use it as a congestion signal in planning, not as a deterministic delay value.
- Ignoring as_of: always display or log as_of alongside the congestion label to communicate data recency to operators.
- Hard-coding values: integrate a daily job that refreshes the data rather than shipping the sample JSON into your app.
FAQ
Is the Ningbo congestion feed real-time?
No. It is based on IMF PortWatch, derived from AIS data but lagged about 6–7 days and aggregated as a 7-day average vs a 90-day baseline. It is not a live queue or anchorage time feed.
Which fields should my integration depend on?
Use congestion, as_of, and metrics.ratio_vs_baseline at a minimum. Keep recent_avg_portcalls_per_day and baseline_avg_portcalls_per_day if you want transparent diagnostics.
How often should I refresh?
Once per day is sufficient. Cache the response for 12–24 hours since updates are daily and lagged.
Can I call without an API key?
Yes, but guests are limited to 100 requests per day per IP. For production workloads, add your X-API-Key header.
Does the endpoint provide live wait times or anchorage delays?
No. It provides a congestion approximation from port-call activity relative to a 90-day baseline. It does not measure vessel wait or anchorage time.
Ready to wire Ningbo (CNNBO) congestion into your TMS or planning scripts? Create an account to get an API key and start building: Register. For schema reference and additional implementation notes, see the Documentation.